FEDERAL POWER ACT CONFORMANCE: TRANSMISSION BUSINESS LINE
| BPA PRACTICE | FERC PRACTICE/PRECEDENT | ISSUES/CONCERNS | |
| I. Revenue Requirement | |||
| A. Revenue Requirement
Determination |
Rates based on forecasted (budgeted) costs for
a specified rate period. (DOE PMA Repayment Policy - RA 6120.2)
Capital cost recovery: Federal repayment basis oriented to interest and principal payments determined by a repayment study that includes only transmission debt. (RA 6120.2 and FERC Orders based on FCRTSA 10 and NWPA 7(a)(2)(C)) Transmission revenue requirements have included charges for revenue financing of new investments or cash required for risk mitigation. (BPA Financial Policy) |
Rates are based on the costs of a test year
with heavy reliance on most recent actual costs.
Capital cost recovery: embedded cost basis, which is oriented to costs on utility’s (ratemaking) books: depreciation and rate of return (the company’s overall weighted average cost of capital and equity) applied to depreciated transmission plant-in-service. |
In order to satisfy applicable statutory
responsibilities and not shift costs or risk to Treasury/taxpayers,
existing cost-recovery requirements, including timely repayment of the
Federal investment as determined by repayment study, should be supported.
• It is believed BPA’s Federal repayment requirements could be satisfied under FPA standards without additional statutory support. • An approach similar to TVA’s margin in revenue requirements (10% of expenses) could provide necessary flexibility. • Existing cost-recovery requirements likely would not be met nor could risk mitigation or revenue financing be accomplished under literal interpretation of embedded cost methodology for a publicly-held entity. |
| B. Rate Period | Rates approved for a specific short-term
period.
• FERC has taken conservative approach to BPA rate approval, requiring frequent review of cost recovery and timely repayment to Treasury. • Long-term rates (>7 years) approved only upon showing that they accounted for small portion of total revenue requirement; long-term rates require more justification/regional support to secure FERC approval. (FERC Policy on PMA Rates) |
Rate approval is generally open-ended.
• Intervenors, including FERC, can request at any time that rates be reopened to review. |
FERC would need to determine the appropriate
treatment in light of their FPA and PMA responsibilities.
• A potential benefit to BPA from the FPA approach would be that, if rates were set high enough based on the test year revenue requirement to cover ongoing annual financial requirements, it might not be necessary to have a rate case again until BPA determined rates needed to be changed (would not have to request particular length for rate period). |
| BPA PRACTICE | FERC PRACTICE/PRECEDENT | ISSUES/CONCERNS | |
| C. Cost Functionalization | Potential for transmission rates to recover
costs that power rates are unable to bear.
• BPA believes that it could rely on section 7(a) of the Northwest Power Act to recover power costs in transmission rates; to date, this position is untested. • BPA takes position that FERC stranded cost rules cannot be applied to BPA to prevent recovery of costs. |
Uniform System of Accounts and standard
allocation methods for common costs.
• Transmission rates based on the cost of transmission service. • FERC will determine on a case-by-case basis whether costs stranded by transmission access are recoverable from specified customers. |
Satisfying existing statutory responsibilities
and not shifting cost or risk to Treasury/taxpayers would call for ability
to include power costs in transmission rates.
• Deregulation may necessitate flexibility for cross-function cost recovery assistance. |
| D. General Cost Recovery | Rates must be based on total system costs and timely repayment of the Federal investment. (NWPA 7(a)(2)) | Prudency and used/useful tests for assets--can be excluded from ratebase. Excluded costs typically passed on to shareholders. | For Treasury and bondholders to be as well off
as under current conditions, it would be necessary to provide assurance of
recovery of all costs.
• BPA has no shareholders to assume excluded costs. |
| BPA PRACTICE | FERC PRACTICE/PRECEDENT | ISSUES/CONCERNS
BPA DRAFT PRINCIPLES |
|
| II. Rate Design and Cost
Allocation |
|||
| A. Segmentation | |||
| 1. Southern Intertie | BPA currently defines a Southern Intertie
segment distinct from the Network, and charges customers a separate rate
to use it.
• Pacificorp and PGE are joint owners with BPA. • Six utilities (Pacificorp, Puget, Seattle, Tacoma, Snohomish, PNGC) purchased a total of 725 MW of capacity ownership on BPA’s portion of the intertie. • 96 Rate Case: After the Settlement agreement had been negotiated, Clark PU argued to roll in the Southern Intertie; no other party addressed this issue in the rate case. |
• FERC normally requires all transmission
facilities to be rolled in, unless the facility can meet certain criteria.
• FERC has strongly encouraged the formation of IGOs/ISOs, in part to do away with pancaked rates which result when transmission customers must use more than one transmission system. |
There is a good probability that the Southern
Intertie would have to be rolled into the Network.
• However, FERC might be willing to continue past BPA practice, given the support of the region. Principle 6. Consumer Protection Rolling the cost of the Southern Intertie ($72 million per year) into the Network ($403 million) would: • benefit the major users of the Southern Intertie by spreading SI cost over all users of transmission system. • increase transmission cost most for customers who do little business on the Southern Intertie (e.g., BPA full requirements customers, many NTP/NT utilities). AC Intertie Capacity Owners receive credit if Southern Intertie is rolled into Network. |
| 2. Generation-Integration (G-I) | BPA defines a G-I segment composed of
facilities on the high side of the step-up transformer.
• Step-up transformers are considered power costs. The entire cost of the G-I segment is allocated to the PBL to be recovered through power rates. |
Step-up transformers and high side facilities
are considered transmission cost according to FERC System of Accounts, and
FERC has generally allowed IOUs to roll these costs in.
• However, recent FERC decisions have called into question rolling in step-up facilities and certain other generation integration costs. • Currently, proposed IndeGO pricing excludes step-up transformers. |
Principle 6--Consumer Protection
Rolling the cost of the G-I segment ($15 million per year) into the Network ($403 million) has a small effect on transmission rates. • BPA power customers would benefit the most, since the cost would now be spread over all users of the transmission system instead of only BPA power customers. • The additional cost of the step-up transformers (Corps and Bureau facilities) is unknown at this time. |
| B. Cost Allocation | BPA allocated costs to firm transmission services on a contract demand or equivalent basis. | Order 888: FERC favors cost allocation based on
adjusted system monthly peak loads, 12 CP for NT service; contract demand
for PTP service.
• However, FERC will allow the transmission provider to propose an alternative method that assigns costs consistently to firm PTP and NT services. |
Principle 6--Consumer Protection
Under FERC’s cost allocation method applied to network costs only, the PTP/IR rates would increase about 15%; the NT/NTP rates would decrease about 20-25%. • PTP/IR customers are generally the PBL, IOUs, and large generating publics. • NTP/NT customers include BPA 1981 PSC customers, and smaller utilities (including PNGC). |
| BPA PRACTICE | FERC PRACTICE/PRECEDENT | ISSUES/CONCERNS
BPA DRAFT PRINCIPLES |
|
| C. NT Rate Design | • BPA’s NT rate schedule does not use the
load ratio methodology, nor provide for a credit for the customer’s
transmission facilities.
• BPA’s NT rate schedule includes 2 average embedded charges: • Base charge (NT customers may exclude from the NT Base charge the load served: with internal generation, over another provider’s transmission systems, and using the power provider’s BPA transmission contract) • Load Shaping charge |
1) A "load ratio" method for charging
NT customers.
• The load ratio method equals: 1) the annual revenue requirement reduced for firm PTP revenues 2) multiplied by (a 12-month rolling average of) the customer’s contribution to the transmission owner’s monthly transmission system peak. 2) FERC also requires a credit for the customer’s own transmission facilities that are integrated with the transmission system of the transmission provider. |
Credit for transmission facilities
• Analyses performed prior to rate case showed that BPA could conceivably end up paying some transmission-owning utilities that it provides wheeling service. • Currently, BPA transmission customers who own transmission facilities have opted for PTP service; instituting a credit for transmission facilities (as well as changing cost allocation) may attract these utilities to NT service. |
| D. Ancillary Services | BPA offers a somewhat different package of
ancillary services than that defined by FERC.
• Scheduling, System Control and Dispatch Service, and Reactive Supply and Voltage Control from Generation Sources Service are not separately identified and offered as ancillary services. • Other BPA ancillary services are packaged differently from FERC’s schedule of ancillary services. • BPA includes transmission losses as an ancillary service, which is not required by FERC. |
FERC defines 6 ancillary services that must be offered by the transmission provider. | Principle 6 - Consumer Protection
No cost shifts: ancillary services are primarily generation-related services; only small amounts of transmission costs are included in the cost of ancillary services. |
| BPA PRACTICE | FERC PRACTICE/PRECEDENT | ISSUES/CONCERNS
BPA DRAFT PRINCIPLES |
|
| III. Process/Legal | |||
| A. Filing of Rates and Contracts | BPA files proposed rates with FERC. | Transmission rates and charges must be filed with FERC, as well as classifications, practices, regulations and policies affecting such transmission rates and charges. | to IOUs) |
| BPA does not file contracts with FERC. | Transmission contracts (wheeling, O&M, interconnection, joint ownership) must be filed for acceptance or approval. | to IOUs), cConflicts with current 90-day statute of limitations. | |
| BPA not required to obtain FERC approval for facilities transfer. | Transfer of facilities (leases, sales) must be approved by FERC. | Conflicts with current delegation to BPA of statutory authority to approve transfer of excess facilities; conflicts with current 90-day statute of limitations. | |
| BPA may allow contracts to terminate without FERC review. | Termination of service must be filed for acceptance or approval. | to IOUs). | |
| B. Standards of Review | BPA rates are reviewed only under standards of cost recovery, widespread use, and equitable allocation between Federal and nonFederal users, except for rates for FERC-ordered transmission under section 211. | Just, reasonable, not unduly discriminatory or preferential. | May shift costs among transmission users, or shift cost/or risk to taxpayers or bondholders. See above discussion under "Revenue Requirement," "Cost Functionalization," "General Cost Recovery," and "Rate Design and Cost Allocation." |
| No application of anticompetitive standard to BPA rates. | Potential application of anticompetitive standard. | Potential conflict with BPA’s statutory cost recovery requirement. | |
| BPA cost recovery standard enables recovery of past underrecoveries (e.g., interest deferral in early 1980’s) based on causation. | No retroactive ratemaking. | May shift costs among transmission users, or shift cost/risk to taxpayers or bondholders.recovery requirement and Principles #6 (minimize cost shifts) and #7 (no shift of cost or risk to taxpayers or bondholders). | |
| BPA PRACTICE | FERC PRACTICE/PRECEDENT | ISSUES/CONCERNS
BPA DRAFT PRINCIPLES |
|
| C. FERC Authority | FERC may only approve or remand filed BPA rates, may not modify rates. | Approval, modification or rejection of filed rates, contracts, practices, etc. | Potential conflict with BPA cost recovery statutory requirement; also, conflict with 90-day statute of limitations in NW Power Act for final contract and policy decisions. |
| FERC has no authority to reopen approved BPA rates. | Authority to reopen and modify approved rates, contracts, etc. upon own initiative or upon complaint. | Potential conflict with BPA cost recovery statutory requirement; also, conflict with 90-day statute of limitations in NW Power Act for final contract and policy decisions. | |
| FERC has no authority to resolve rates or contract disputes. | Authority to resolve disputes involving rates and contracts. | Conflict with Ninth Circuit jurisdiction over rates disputes, Court of Claims and District Court jurisdiction over contract disputes. | |
| FERC has no authority to disallow termination of service. | Authority to disallow termination of service. | ||
| D. Procedures | BPA initiates 7(i) regional hearing up to 9 months prior to effective date. | Filing of proposal between 60 and 120 days prior to effective date. | May affect some parties’ ability to principle #4 (public review and comment on major regional transmission policies. |
| No filing fees for FERC filing. | Applicant pays annual fees. | ||
| BPA 7(i) hearing officer makes only evidentiary determinations, Administrator makes all substantive findings and conclusions. | FERC may accept proposal or assign it to an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) for hearing and determination of all issues. | Potential conflict with statutory cost recovery obligation. | |
| Administrator’s decisions filed with FERC for approval; rates either approved or remanded to Administrator. | ALJ decision affirmed, modified, or remanded to ALJ for further determination. | Potential conflict with (1) statutory cost recovery obligation and (2) preservation of system value for Northwest. | |
| E. Judicial Review | Decision reviewable only in Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. | FERC decision is reviewable in D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals or in utility’s home Federal Appeals Court. | Potential loss of consistent judicial decisions. |
| Less deference to FERC because of its restricted review. | FERC given some deference in technical and policy areas. | Potential conflict with (1) statutory cost recovery obligation and (2) preservation of system value for Northwest. | |