July 19, 2004
Fish hatcheries in the Columbia River Basin need to have clearly
defined goals and should be managed carefully to reduce risks to the
survival of weak, naturally spawning runs, the Council recommends.
The Council this week released for public review and comment its recommendations
for policies to guide fish hatcheries in the future. The recommendations
seek to improve the integration of hatchery production with natural
production of fish to increase the geographic range and genetic
diversity of fish production.
?It was a challenge to identify and analyze all of the hatcheries
in the basin, and it will be a challenge to effect change,? Council
Chair Judi Danielson said. ?One of the most difficult challenges is
that most hatchery programs were created decades ago under legal
requirements that stressed different priorities than we have today, such
as producing fish for commercial and sport harvest. Those are still
important goals, but today hatcheries also are being used ? and will
continue to be used ? to conserve weak stocks and assist the recovery
of threatened and endangered species. Our recommendations will improve
the effectiveness and efficiency of hatcheries.?
The Council responded to a congressional directive by conducting a
scientific review, with the assistance of the Independent Scientific
Advisory Board, of the state of artificial production in the Columbia
basin. The Artificial Production Review
resulted in a set of recommended guidelines for hatchery practices,
ecological interactions and genetics. The Council followed the review
with a comprehensive evaluation of all 227 hatcheries and hatchery
programs in the basin. This effort, the Artificial
Production Review and Evaluation, concluded that:
- hatcheries are limited in what they can accomplish;
- the purposes for hatchery programs have changed and will continue
to change;
- hatcheries will continue to play a part in recovery and management
of fish in the Columbia River and elsewhere; and
- hatcheries require reform to align their policies and practices
with current social priorities and scientific knowledge, to
determine hatchery performance and to operate in a businesslike
fashion.
Based on these conclusions, the Council developed three broad, draft
recommendations for public comment:
- The Council, NOAA Fisheries, and the Bonneville Power
Administration should facilitate a regional discussion that clearly
identifies basinwide goals and priorities for salmon and steelhead.
The Council's subbasin planning is an appropriate process to
design and implement long-term goals and priorities, and strategies
to achieve them. This will reduce disparities among production
policies of existing hatcheries.
- Agencies that oversee hatcheries should adopt prioritized criteria
to reduce hatchery risk to weak, naturally spawning stocks through
techniques such as a) improving broodstock management; b)
integrating naturally spawning fish into hatchery broodstocks or
reducing excessive straying of hatchery-bred fish; c) improving fish
passage; d) preventing disease and e) improving water quality. Each
hatchery should have a plan for future activities based on its
genetics management plan and recommendations for fish production
developed in the subbasin planning process.
- Each hatchery should be reviewed periodically to direct changes
and assess progress toward goals.
After the 30-day public comment period (deadline is August 20, 2004),
the Council will finalize its recommendations and submit them to
Congress.