|
The following is a provisional set of
environmental characteristic objectives for the basin level. The Council
has asked the Independent Scientific Advisory Board to review these
provisional basin level environmental characteristics by June 2001. The
ISAB will report to the Council on the scientific soundness and basinwide
applicability of the environmental characteristics, as well as their
utility for further defining biological objectives at the province and
subbasin levels. As part of its review, the ISAB should consider and
report to the Council on the applicability of these objectives in the most
altered areas of the basin, the blocked areas.
The Council will make the ISAB’s report publicly available and seek
views and comment from interested parties. The Council will consider the
report of the ISAB and the views and comments of others on the report, and
will confirm or revise these basin level objectives for environmental
characteristics for purposes of providing guidance for subbasin level
planning and further program amendments.
Provisional biological objectives for environmental characteristics at
the basin level
Basin level environmental characteristics describe the kinds of changes
that are needed across the Columbia basin to achieve the biological
performance objectives called for by the program.
- Protect the areas and ecological functions that are at present
relatively productive for fish and wildlife populations (e.g., the
Hanford Reach fall chinook; spring chinook in the upper John Day
River) to provide a base for expansion of healthy populations as we
rehabilitate degraded habitats in other areas.
- Protect and enhance habitats and ecological function to allow for
the restoration of more natural population structures, by allowing for
the expansion of productive populations and by habitat restoration
actions that connect weak populations to stronger populations and to
each other. Allow for the recovery of depleted and listed populations
to at least the point of self-sustainability and a low probability of
extinction.
- Protection and expansion of habitats and ecological functions should
allow for an increase in the number, complexity and range of
multi-species fish and wildlife assemblages and communities. Increases
in the productivity, abundance, and life-history diversity of specific
fish and wildlife populations are dependent on, and should not be
viewed in isolation from, these multi-species communities.
- Protect and restore freshwater habitat for all life history stages
of the key species. Protect and increase ecological connectivity
between aquatic areas, riparian zones, floodplains and uplands.
- Increase the connections between rivers and their floodplains,
side channels and riparian zones.
- Manage riparian areas to protect aquatic conditions and form a
transition to floodplain terrestrial areas and side channels.
- Identify, protect and restore the functions of key alluvial river
reaches.
- Reconnect restored tributary habitats to protected or restored
mainstem habitats, especially in the area of productive mainstem
populations.
- Allow patterns of water flow to move more than at present toward
the natural hydrographic pattern in terms of quantity, quality and
fluctuation.
- Habitat restoration may be framed in the context of measured
trends in water quality.
- Allow for seasonal fluctuations in flow. Stabilize daily
fluctuations.
- Increase the correspondence between water temperatures and the
naturally-occurring regimes of temperatures throughout the basin.
- Significantly reduce watershed erosion where human activities have
accelerated sediment inputs.
- Increase energy and nutrient connections within the system to
increase productivity and expand biological communities.
- Allow for biological diversity to increase among and within
populations and species to increase ecological resilience to
environmental variability.
- Expand the complexity and range of habitats to allow for greater
life history and between species diversity.
- Manage human activities to minimize artificial selection or
limitation of life history traits.
- Restoring habitat and access to habitat that establishes life
history diversity is a priority.
- Increase genetic connections and gene flow within the ecological
system to facilitate development, expansion and protection of
population structures.
- Increase the abundance and range of existing habitats and
populations.
- Expand and connect existing habitat pockets to facilitate
development of resilient population structures for aquatic
communities.
- Identify, protect and restore ecosystem functions in the Columbia
River estuary and nearshore ocean discharge plume as affected by
actions within the Columbia River watershed.
- Evaluate flow regulation, river operations and estuary-area
habitat changes to better understand the relationship between
estuary and near-shore plume characteristics and the productivity,
abundance and diversity of salmon and steelhead populations.
- Enhance the natural expression of biological diversity in salmon and
steelhead populations to accommodate mortality and environmental
variability in the ocean.
- Accept significant variation in the productivity, capacity and
life-history diversity for any particular population over any
particular time period, as part of the normal environmental condition.
A measure of whether key ecological functions have increased
sufficiently will be whether the system can accept normal
environmental variation without collapse of the fish and wildlife
population and community structure.
Basin and province level objectives must also describe expectations for
the characteristics of the mainstem, estuary and ocean environments shared
by all populations of salmon and steelhead in the subbasins. In other
words, subbasin planners need to know what are the program’s
expectations or assumptions for survival of their respective populations
in the parts of their life cycles outside the subbasins, including
survival through the mainstem and in the estuary and ocean. For example,
the objectives and strategies that planners would choose for a subbasin
might vary substantially if expectations for juvenile survival through the
mainstem over the planning period are 50 percent versus 90 percent.
^ top |