Council Home
Energy
Comprehensive review archive
MEMORANDUM
TO: Followers of the Comprehensive
Review
SUBJECT: Synopsis of House Resources Hearing on
BPA and the Comprehensive Energy Review
On Tuesday, May 21st, the House Resources Committee's
Subcommittee on Water and Power Resources held a hearing on
the "Bonneville Power Administration Operations and the
Status of the Comprehensive Review of the Northwest Energy
System." The subcommittee's chairman, Congressman John
Doolittle (R-CA), presided. Other subcommittee members in
attendance were Congressman Wes Cooley (R-OR), Congressman
Peter DeFazio (D-OR), Congressman Doc Hastings (R-WA),
Congressman Calvin Dooley (D-CA), and Congresswoman Helen
Chenoweth (R-ID). Chairman Doolittle gave an opening
statement and asked one or two questions and then turned the
gavel over to Congressman Cooley, who chaired the majority of
the hearing. Congressman Dooley asked no questions, and
stayed for only a short time.
Witnesses included Jack Robertson, Deputy Chief Executive
Officer of the Bonneville Power Administration, Alvin
Alexanderson, Senior Vice President/General Counsel for
Portland General Electric, K.C. Golden, Energy Policy
Consultant, Richard J. Brown, General Manager of Ravalli
County Electric Cooperative, and John Carr, Executive
Director of the Direct Services Industries. The witnesses'
written testimony, submitted for the official hearing record,
is available. Please give me a call if you would like
copies.
Several major issue areas were addressed during the
hearing. The followingis a brief description of the
discussion.
- Comprehensive Review: Every witness had positive
things to say about the Comprehensive Review. It was
generally thought to be progressing well, and substantive
recommendations are expected to result from the process. The
subcommittee members appeared to be aware of the purpose of
the Comprehensive Review and seemed supportive of the
region's efforts to define the future direction of the
region's energy system. Both John Carr and K.C. Golden said
they hoped Congress would not take any action until the
Comprehensive Review was concluded. Al Alexanderson said that
Congress should quickly enact legislation once the
Comprehensive Review finishes its work
- Transmission: Several subcommittee members were aware
of the FERC's "mega" NOPR (Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking) and the prospect of open access to transmission
and an enhanced competitive market. The Members also were
aware of the desire by many to separate Bonneville's
generation and transmission businesses, and that Bonneville's
transmission rates had increased quite significantly over the
last few years. The witnesses, including Jack Robertson,
endorsed the need to separate Bonneville's transmission and
generation activities. He said that, absent legislation,
Bonneville would separate its transmission and generation
functions, but keep them under the same roof. Robertson also
indicated that Bonneville would conform to the direction
contained in FERC's NOPR.
- Is Bonneville Taking Actions Today that Will Preclude
Future Options?: There was widespread concern among
subcommittee members that Bonneville was currently engaged in
activities that would nullify future recommendations by the
Comprehensive Review and future actions by Congress. In
particular, this discussion focused on whether Bonneville is
signing long-term contracts that will commit it to deliver
electricity beyond the year 2001. Robertson tried to assure
the subcommittee that Bonneville was not signing contracts
for periods longer than five years. (Although the timing of
some of those five year contracts may result in contract
periods extending beyond 2001.)
- Bonneville's Energy Services Business Line: There was
unanimous distress among the subcommittee members concerning
Bonneville's proposal to enter the energy services business.
They thought it was inappropriate for Bonneville to compete
with private industry. Jack Robertson tried to defend the
initiative by saying that the total amount of energy services
business in the region is approximately $200 million per
year, and that Bonneville was only seeking to participate in
about 10 percent ($20 million) of that market. He also said
that certain sectors of the energy services market, such as
rural areas, were not being pursued by private industry, and
that Bonneville would not necessarily be competing with
anyone in those areas. Finally, Robertson said that Bonneville was trying to
stimulate the transformation of the market for conservation
and that its proposal was intended to further the goals of
the Northwest Power Act, but at less cost to the ratepayers.
Robertson also said that Bonneville will submit its energy
services proposal to the Comprehensive Review for its
examination.
- Public Purposes: There was significant discussion
of how the region will achieve its public purposes objectives
(conservation, renewables, rural and low income assistance)
in a competitive marketplace. Congressman DeFazio was
especially interested in this issue. While all the witnesses
said that they supported maintaining public purposes, there
were differing opinions on how to do it. John Carr, for
example, said that the region should try to protect the
Northwest's values through competitive markets. If that
fails, then alternatives should be pursued. K.C. Golden said
that the region needs to rethink Bonneville's role in a
competitive environment, and to articulate clearly its public
purpose missions. There also was discussion over how public
purposes would be financed. Two possibilities, a transmission
charge and a distribution charge, were discussed. Congressman DeFazio was adamant that he would oppose a
system benefits charge (which I interpreted as being a
distribution charge) because it wasnothing more than a tax on
electricity. DeFazio also said that a system benefits charge
may be inequitable because some users who have historically
benefited from the system could probably avoid paying it.
[ Document Access | Regional Review Home Page ]
Please contact feedback@newsdata.com if you have questions or comments
about this website or call 206/285-4848.
Last modified: June 5, 1996
http://www.newsdata.com/enernet/review/documents/memo2.html
Copyright © 1996 Energy NewsData